Keeping the world up to date with me.
Wednesday, February 23, 2005
Frequently asked questions
Frequently asked questions about UK terrorist legislation. Look here to see just how many of your liberties are disappearing.
Guilty! New Labour could arrest self under new terror law
From The Register: Guilty! New Labour could arrest self under new terror law - a funny example of an outrageous new law.
Tuesday, February 22, 2005
Monday, February 21, 2005
Tuesday, February 15, 2005
America and Europe
On 2nd December 1823, President James Monroe addressed the Congress of the USA as follows:
'...the American continents... are henceforth not to be considered as subjects for future colonization by any European powers... In the wars of the European powers, in matters relating to themselves, we have never taken part, nor does it comport with our policies to do so.'In the same year, Thomas Jefferson wrote to Monroe, saying:
' It is our policy to steer clear of permanent alliances with any portion of the foreign world. I have ever deemed it fundamental for the United States never to take part in the quarrels of Europe, Their political interests are entirely distinct from ours..... The are nations of eternal war.'Make of that what you will.
Wednesday, February 09, 2005
Tuesday, February 08, 2005
Monday, February 07, 2005
Just like us.
Macaques swap juice for a glimpse of leaders' faces and females' rears. A bit like Hello magazine, then...
EFF: Endangered Gizmos!
EFF: Endangered Gizmos! Things that are great that they might stop you buying soon.
Sunday, February 06, 2005
Lab relations sour as missing disk charges are proved false
From Nature:
Los Alamos lab's computer disks didn't go missing - they never existed.
[WASHINGTON] Two classified computer disks that allegedly vanished last summer at the Los Alamos nuclear-weapons laboratory in New Mexico never existed, according to an investigation by the government agency that oversees the lab.
The security lapse, together with an unrelated accident, led to a three-month shutdown of the laboratory last summer, with director Peter Nanos accusing scientists of operating in a "cowboy culture" (see Nature 430, 387; 2004). The conclusion that the disks never existed has infuriated many of the lab's researchers
"The talk in the halls is mutinous," says Doug Roberts, a computer scientist at the laboratory. "I've been at the lab for 20 years and morale has never been this bad before."
The Los Alamos National Laboratory has been battered in recent years by a wave of scandals. In 1999, it was the subject of national scrutiny when Wen Ho Lee, a Taiwanese-born scientist, was accused of smuggling nuclear secrets to China (see Nature 398, 96; 1999) and subsequently acquitted. In 2000, two computer hard drives containing classified data disappeared from a secure area inside the laboratory, only to reappear later behind a photocopier (see Nature 405, 725; 2000). And in 2003, the laboratory's director and deputy director resigned following accusations that they had improperly fired two whistleblowers who had alleged widespread theft at the lab (see Nature 421, 99; 2003).
The latest trouble for the laboratory began early last July, when an inventory of classified data in its weapons-physics directorate revealed that four disk drives were missing. Almost immediately, two of the drives were found to have been improperly moved to a different building, but another two could not be located. In response, Nanos shut down large parts of the laboratory and publicly chided the scientists working there for failing to follow security procedures. "This willful flouting of the rules must stop, and I don't care how many people I have to fire to make it stop," he wrote in the 2 August issue of the laboratory's newsletter.
But now it seems that the missing drives were in fact an artefact of flawed inventory procedures. According to the report by the National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA), which was released on 28 January, 12 barcodes used to catalogue classified disk drives were issued to a group that needed only 10. The extra barcodes were nevertheless included in a master list, and so when auditors conducted an inventory last July, they concluded that two disks were missing. "The allegedly missing disks never existed and no compromise of classified material has occurred," the report explains.
Many scientists at the laboratory say that the incident, together with Nanos's public rebuke, has profoundly damaged the relationship between Los Alamos researchers and the lab's management.
"Trust in upper management has been completely lost," says Brad Holian, who has worked as a theoretical physicist at the laboratory for 32 years. Holian says that the three-month shutdown was the breaking point for many already frustrated scientists. "We were told in the theoretical division that we couldn't write down calculations on the blackboard," he says. Many of his colleagues are leaving the lab, and Holian himself says that he plans to retire this March — years earlier than he had originally planned. "I think there are a lot of people in my situation," he says.
Los Alamos lab's computer disks didn't go missing - they never existed.
[WASHINGTON] Two classified computer disks that allegedly vanished last summer at the Los Alamos nuclear-weapons laboratory in New Mexico never existed, according to an investigation by the government agency that oversees the lab.
The security lapse, together with an unrelated accident, led to a three-month shutdown of the laboratory last summer, with director Peter Nanos accusing scientists of operating in a "cowboy culture" (see Nature 430, 387; 2004). The conclusion that the disks never existed has infuriated many of the lab's researchers
"The talk in the halls is mutinous," says Doug Roberts, a computer scientist at the laboratory. "I've been at the lab for 20 years and morale has never been this bad before."
The Los Alamos National Laboratory has been battered in recent years by a wave of scandals. In 1999, it was the subject of national scrutiny when Wen Ho Lee, a Taiwanese-born scientist, was accused of smuggling nuclear secrets to China (see Nature 398, 96; 1999) and subsequently acquitted. In 2000, two computer hard drives containing classified data disappeared from a secure area inside the laboratory, only to reappear later behind a photocopier (see Nature 405, 725; 2000). And in 2003, the laboratory's director and deputy director resigned following accusations that they had improperly fired two whistleblowers who had alleged widespread theft at the lab (see Nature 421, 99; 2003).
The latest trouble for the laboratory began early last July, when an inventory of classified data in its weapons-physics directorate revealed that four disk drives were missing. Almost immediately, two of the drives were found to have been improperly moved to a different building, but another two could not be located. In response, Nanos shut down large parts of the laboratory and publicly chided the scientists working there for failing to follow security procedures. "This willful flouting of the rules must stop, and I don't care how many people I have to fire to make it stop," he wrote in the 2 August issue of the laboratory's newsletter.
But now it seems that the missing drives were in fact an artefact of flawed inventory procedures. According to the report by the National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA), which was released on 28 January, 12 barcodes used to catalogue classified disk drives were issued to a group that needed only 10. The extra barcodes were nevertheless included in a master list, and so when auditors conducted an inventory last July, they concluded that two disks were missing. "The allegedly missing disks never existed and no compromise of classified material has occurred," the report explains.
Many scientists at the laboratory say that the incident, together with Nanos's public rebuke, has profoundly damaged the relationship between Los Alamos researchers and the lab's management.
"Trust in upper management has been completely lost," says Brad Holian, who has worked as a theoretical physicist at the laboratory for 32 years. Holian says that the three-month shutdown was the breaking point for many already frustrated scientists. "We were told in the theoretical division that we couldn't write down calculations on the blackboard," he says. Many of his colleagues are leaving the lab, and Holian himself says that he plans to retire this March — years earlier than he had originally planned. "I think there are a lot of people in my situation," he says.
Tuesday, February 01, 2005
Man urinates his way out of avalanche
Man urinates his way out of avalanche. Those relaxed Slovaks....
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
Blog Archive
-
▼
2005
(89)
-
▼
February
(13)
- Frequently asked questions
- Guilty! New Labour could arrest self under new ter...
- Thought for the day...
- BBC News: Rays to nab nuclear smugglers
- Backing Blair :: UK General Election 2005
- Hiiiii-yaaa!
- America and Europe
- The Cuddly Menace
- Buy a Nano-Mac: only 29 dollars
- Just like us.
- EFF: Endangered Gizmos!
- Lab relations sour as missing disk charges are pro...
- Man urinates his way out of avalanche
-
▼
February
(13)